Home > Country profiles > Investing
Denmark: Investing
FDI in Figures | Why You Should Choose to Invest in Denmark | Protection of Foreign Investment | Procedures Relative to Foreign Investment | Office Real Estate and Land Ownership | Investment Aid | Investment Opportunities | Finding Assistance For Further Information
The level of FDI in Denmark is far below the country's potential and tends to stagnate. After having registered a slight increase in 2010, FDI flows have recovered in 2011 but are expected to remain modest in 2012 because of the crisis in the eurozone. The country's strengths include: a highly skilled and multilingual workforce, flexible labor market, ultramodern infrastructure (telecommunications, transport, etc..), tax incentives for businesses.
| Foreign Direct Investment | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
| FDI Inward Flow (million USD) | 2,717 | 2,966 | -1,814 |
| FDI Stock (million USD) | 150,938 | 152,521 | 139,205 |
| Performance Index*, Ranking on 141 Economies | 125 | 66 | - |
| Potential Index**, Ranking on 141 Economies | 24 | - | - |
| Number of Greenfield Investments*** | 65 | 36 | - |
| FDI Inwards (in % of GFCF****) | 3.8 | 8.0 | - |
| FDI Stock (in % of GDP) | 44.3 | 50.9 | - |
Source: UNCTAD - Last Available Data.
Note: * The UNCTAD Inward FDI Performance Index is Based on a Ratio of the Country's Share in Global FDI Inflows and its Share in Global GDP. ** The UNCTAD Inward FDI Potential Index is Based on 12 Economic and Structural Variables Such as GDP, Foreign Trade, FDI, Infrastructures, Energy Use, R&D, Education, Country Risk. *** Green Field Investments Are a Form of Foreign Direct Investment Where a Parent Company Starts a New Venture in a Foreign Country By Constructing New Operational Facilities From the Ground Up. **** Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) Measures the Value of Additions to Fixed Assets Purchased By Business, Government and Households Less Disposals of Fixed Assets Sold Off or Scrapped.
| Main Investing Countries | 2010, in % |
| Sweden | 26.8 |
| The Netherlands | 12.1 |
| UK | 8.1 |
| USA | 8.0 |
| Luxembourg | 7.6 |
| Germany | 7.5 |
| Norway | 6.8 |
| Main Invested Sectors | 2010, in % |
| Financial services | 37.9 |
| Manufacturing | 20.6 |
| Trade and transport | 16.0 |
| Information and telecommunications | 9.2 |
| Business services | 4.8 |
| Agricultural, fishing, mining | 2.3 |
Source: National Bank of Denmark - Last Available Data.
| Denmark | OECD | United States | Germany | |
| Index of Transaction Transparency* | 7.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 |
| Index of Manager’s Responsibility** | 5.0 | 5.2 | 9.0 | 5.0 |
| Index of Shareholders’ Power*** | 7.0 | 6.8 | 9.0 | 5.0 |
| Index of Investor Protection**** | 6.3 | 6.0 | 8.3 | 5.0 |
Source: Doing Business - Last Available Data.
Note: *The Greater the Index, the More Transparent the Conditions of Transactions. **The Greater the Index, the More the Manager is Personally Responsible. *** The Greater the Index, the Easier it Will Be For Shareholders to Take Legal Action. **** The Greater the Index, the Higher the Level of Investor Protection.
Any Comments About This Content? Report It to Us.
© Export Entreprises SA, All Rights Reserved.
Last Updates: May 2012